Creatio vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 40.2 versus 3.5 for Creatio, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Creatio if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 42% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
- low-code process automation
- workflow automation combined with CRM
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.2 vs 3.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Creatio | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.5% | 40.2% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.8% | down−2.5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #28 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 8.2% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 47 |
| Positive in AI answers | 45% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Creatio +0.7999999999999998pp · OutSystems −2.3999999999999986pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
8 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Creatio | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #6 | #5 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | AI Mode | #7 | #1 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #8 | #2 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #9 | #4 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #8 | #2 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #10 | #6 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #9 | #2 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #10 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Creatio | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Support | Support plans, Academy, Partner network | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series D (unconfirmed) · $268M raised | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | Mid-size and enterprise organizations, especially in financial services, wanting CRM with no-code workflow and AI agents | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
Creatio
Pricing not available.
OutSystems
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Creatio
- low-code process automation
- workflow automation combined with CRM
- best for agile process-driven enterprises
- configurable workflows and process automation
- accessible composable pricing bundling workflow and CRM
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Creatio vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/creatio-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.