CreatioAI CRM and workflow platform for people and AI agents
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Creatio vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 3.5 for Creatio.
Choose Creatio if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 18% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- low-code process automation
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 3.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Creatio | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.8% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #28 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 45% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Creatio +0.7999999999999998pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CreatioSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Creatio ranked higher
0Supabase ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Creatio | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Support plans, Academy, Partner network | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series D (unconfirmed) · $268M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Mid-size and enterprise organizations, especially in financial services, wanting CRM with no-code workflow and AI agents | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Creatio
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Creatio
- low-code process automation
- workflow automation combined with CRM
- best for agile process-driven enterprises
- configurable workflows and process automation
- accessible composable pricing bundling workflow and CRM
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Creatio vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/creatio-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.