CrelateThe Strategic Recruiting Platform
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Crelate vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 2.6 for Crelate, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Crelate if…
- You want a lower entry price ($85 vs $299)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 2.6)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 80+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Crelate | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.6% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #31 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Crelate 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrelateWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Crelate ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Crelate | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #27 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Crelate | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $85 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted multi-tenant SaaS running on Microsoft Azure | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 80+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Self-service help center and Crelate Academy, Daily training webinars, Live-chat support, Call-back phone support | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Eagle, Idaho, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B (strategic investment from Five Elms Capital) · $12M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Executive search, direct placement and in-house talent teams that want one platform for ATS, recruiting CRM and sourcing. | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Crelate
Essentials$85per user / month, paid annually
Business$119per user / month, billed annually or monthly
Business PlusCustomper user, paid annually
PlatformCustomUser or site license pricing
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Crelate
Profile in progress.
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Crelate vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/crelate-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.