CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
vs
DescopeDrag & drop customer and agentic IAM for apps, AI agents and MCP servers.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
CyberArk vs Descope
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 1.9 for Descope.
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 1.9)
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
Choose Descope if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (62% vs 49% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS coverage
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | Descope |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | down−3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 62% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · Descope −2pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CyberArkDescope
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CyberArk ranked higher
0Descope ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | Descope |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $249 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | Cloud SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | Community support, Web and email support, Slack support, Dedicated CS engineer |
| Founded | 1999 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | Los Altos, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | Seed extension · $88M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | Startups, SaaS companies and enterprises adding customer auth, B2B SSO/SCIM, or identity for AI agents and MCP servers. |
Plans side by side
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Descope
Free Forever$0month
Pro$249month, billed annually
Growth$799month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Descope
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
- Robust developer-focused free tier with built-in MFA
- Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder that is easy to use
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs Descope”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-descope, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.