Descope vs Keeper Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Descope is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.
Choose Descope if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (62% vs 0% positive)
- You need CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS coverage
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 3 or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Descope | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 0.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−3% | down−0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #26 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 62% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Descope −2pp · Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Descope leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Descope | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $249 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe |
| Support | Community support, Web and email support, Slack support, Dedicated CS engineer | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University |
| Founded | 2022 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Los Altos, California, United States | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed extension · $88M raised | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised |
| Best for | Startups, SaaS companies and enterprises adding customer auth, B2B SSO/SCIM, or identity for AI agents and MCP servers. | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform |
Plans side by side
Descope
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Descope
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
- Robust developer-focused free tier with built-in MFA
- Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder that is easy to use
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Descope vs Keeper Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/descope-vs-keeper-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.