Skip to content
SlateIndex
DescopeDrag & drop customer and agentic IAM for apps, AI agents and MCP servers.
vs
Keeper SecurityThe identity security platform for humans, machines and AI agents
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Descope vs Keeper Security

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Descope is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.

Choose Descope if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.5)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (62% vs 0% positive)
  • You need CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS coverage

Choose Keeper Security if…

  • You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 3 or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Descope Keeper Security
Visibility score1.9%0.5%
Change vs last weekdown−3%down−0.1%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#26#36
Share of voice0.6%0.3%
Mentions this run21
Positive in AI answers62%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Descope 2%

Descope −2pp · Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Descope leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.4%
3.2%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
3.7%
0.9%
DescopeKeeper Security

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Descope ranked higher
0Keeper Security ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDescopeKeeper Security
Pricing modelUsage-basedPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $249 / moContact sales
Free planYesNo
DeploymentCloud SaaSCloud (SaaS)
Integrations—100+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP HighISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe
SupportCommunity support, Web and email support, Slack support, Dedicated CS engineerPhone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University
Founded20222011
HeadquartersLos Altos, California, United StatesChicago, Illinois, United States
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingSeed extension · $88M raisedMinority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised
Best forStartups, SaaS companies and enterprises adding customer auth, B2B SSO/SCIM, or identity for AI agents and MCP servers.Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform

Plans side by side

Descope

Free Forever$0month
Pro$249month, billed annually
Growth$799month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustom
Descope pricing

Keeper Security

Business Starter Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
Business Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
Enterprise Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
KeeperMSPCustomcontact sales
KeeperPAMCustomrequest a quote
Keeper Security pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Descope

  • Low-code option
  • High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
  • Robust developer-focused free tier with built-in MFA
  • Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder that is easy to use

    Keeper Security

    Profile in progress.

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Descope vs Keeper Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/descope-vs-keeper-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.