DockEnablement that sellers and buyers love.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Dock vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Dock is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 20.1 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Dock if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.1 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 51% positive)
- You need GDPR compliant coverage
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $350)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Dock | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 20.1% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #7 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 5.2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 29 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 60% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Dock 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Dock leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DockQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Dock ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Dock | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $350 / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Priority support on Standard and higher plans, Dedicated customer success manager on Enterprise | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2021 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $7M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Sales, customer success and marketing teams that want deal rooms, content, training and order forms on one platform. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Dock
Free$0forever
Standard$350month
Premium$1,000month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual contract
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Dock
- Good fit for mid-market B2B SaaS teams
- Digital sales rooms that replace messy email chains
- Best overall choice for early to growth-stage startups
- Free plan and free trial available
- Transparent, publicly documented pricing
- Tighter asset limits on the free plan
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Dock vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/dock-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.