EspoCRMFree open source CRM for managing contacts, sales, support, and marketing in one place.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
EspoCRM vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 0 for EspoCRM.
Choose EspoCRM if…
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $35)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 9001 coverage
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | EspoCRM | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #45 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
EspoCRM 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
EspoCRMQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0EspoCRM ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | EspoCRM | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $15 per seat / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted or self-hosted (on-premise) | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 2000+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 9001 | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | 12x5 support on Cloud plans, Community forum, Service request form | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Texas, USA | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 1–10 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Raised Funding Round (undated, per Crunchbase) | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Small and mid-size companies that want an affordable, customizable CRM, including self-hosted deployments. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
EspoCRM
Basic$15per user/month, minimum 3 users
Enterprise$25per user/month, minimum 5 users
Ultimate$69per user/month, minimum 10 users
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
EspoCRM
Profile in progress.
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “EspoCRM vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/espocrm-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.