FusionAuth vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 1 for FusionAuth, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose FusionAuth if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 39% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA BAA available or GDPR coverage
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 1)
- You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $162)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | FusionAuth | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+1% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #29 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
FusionAuth +0.6pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | FusionAuth | Okta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #9 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | FusionAuth | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $162 / mo | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, on-premises, hybrid, air-gapped, or FusionAuth Cloud (dedicated hosting) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA BAA available, GDPR | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | Community forums and GitHub, Email support, 24/7 email and phone support, Private Slack channel | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2009 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Broomfield, CO, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Growth (led by Updata Partners) · $65M raised | IPO |
| Best for | Developer and engineering teams that need customer authentication they can self-host or run on dedicated infrastructure. | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
FusionAuth
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
FusionAuth
- Clear public pricing tiers
- Fully featured open-source self-hosted option
- No forced enterprise sales
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “FusionAuth vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fusionauth-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.