GemBetter recruiting, built on Gem.
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Gem vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Gem is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.1 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Gem if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.1 vs 1.9)
- You want a lower entry price ($130 vs $149)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
Choose Loxo if…
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Gem | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.1% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #19 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Gem 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Gem leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GemLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2Gem ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Gem | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | ChatGPT | #4 | #6 |
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #9 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Gem | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $130 per seat / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Web application and Chrome extension | — |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Onshore support, success and development team | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $148M raised | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Growing talent acquisition teams, from startups to global enterprises, that want sourcing, ATS and CRM in one platform or AI layered onto an existing ATS. | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
Gem
Gem + Your ATSCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem All-in-OneCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem Startup Program$130per month, billed yearly
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Gem
- Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
- Startup discount on yearly billing
- Candidate sourcing and interview management
- Career websites and candidate engagement
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Gem vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gem-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.