Gem alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Gem
LeverBest forSmall, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations.90% of Gem answersGreenhouseBest forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises80% of Gem answersWorkableBest forCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.80% of Gem answersAshbyBest forAmbitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring80% of Gem answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Gem has a visibility score of 5.1 in Recruiting, #19 of 83. AI answers that name Gem most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lever | Small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations. | — | 22.2% | ATS and CRM combined in one platform, with AI built across the hiring funnel rather than added through separate tools. |
| Greenhouse | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Contact sales | 38.5% | Connects employers and job seekers in one hiring ecosystem, so sourcing, interviewing and the ATS share the same signal |
| Workable | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. | $299 / mo | 30.1% | An AI agent built into a full applicant tracking system, which reads the system of record before it acts and inherits the platform's security and access model. |
| Ashby | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring | $400 / mo | 17.4% | An all-in-one platform that combines ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics, with AI embedded in every layer |
Alternative 1
Lever vs Gem →Lever
Lever suits small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 22.2% visibility score · #3 in Recruiting
Key features
- Lever AI-Powered Hiring Platform — ATS and CRM in one platform with reporting, AI screening, unlimited AI interview transcripts and summaries, and AI fraud prevention signals.
- Candidate Insights — Add-on that surfaces skills, fit, assessments and reference data in the candidate profile.
- AI Screening by VONQ — Add-on that pre-screens candidates with AI agents embedded in the career site.
- Onboarding — Add-on for automated new hire workflows, task management and document collection.
Lever vs Gem
| Dimension | Lever | Gem |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22.2% | 5.1% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $130 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
- Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
- Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies
Cons
Alternative 2
Greenhouse vs Gem →Greenhouse
Greenhouse suits employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises.
Quick facts
- Contact sales · flat tiers
- 38.5% visibility score · #1 in Recruiting
Key features
- Greenhouse Sourcing — Surfaces job seekers from MyGreenhouse and prospect pools when a role opens.
- Greenhouse Real Talent — Flags fraud, spam and misrepresentation, verifies candidates and ranks best-fit applicants.
- Greenhouse Voice AI — Two-way, voice-based first interview on the candidate's schedule, using the team's own questions and rubric.
- Greenhouse Notetaker — Records, transcribes and summarizes interviews and maps notes to scorecard questions.
Greenhouse vs Gem
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Gem |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 5.1% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $130 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Cons
Alternative 3
Workable vs Gem →Workable
Workable suits companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses..
Quick facts
- $299 / mo · flat tiers
- 15-day free trial
- 30.1% visibility score · #2 in Recruiting
- 270+ native integrations
Key features
- Workable ATS — Applicant tracking system covering requisitions, sourcing, pipelines, interviews, offers and analytics.
- Workable Agent — AI recruiting agents that source, screen and engage candidates inside the ATS, sold as four agents including Sourcing, Screening and Engagement.
- Workable HR — HR information system with employee onboarding, time off, time tracking, e-signatures and payroll preparation.
- Performance & Engagement — 360-degree performance reviews, performance tracking and employee surveys, sold as an add-on.
Workable vs Gem
| Dimension | Workable | Gem |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 30.1% | 5.1% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | $130 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 15-day free trial | — |
Pros
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
Cons
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Alternative 4
Ashby vs Gem →Ashby
Ashby suits ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring.
Quick facts
- $400 / mo · flat tiers
- 17.4% visibility score · #7 in Recruiting
- 250+ native integrations
Key features
- Ashby All-in-One — One recruiting platform covering ATS, CRM and sourcing, scheduling, offers and analytics.
- Ashby Analytics — Recruiting analytics that run on top of an existing applicant tracking system.
Ashby vs Gem
| Dimension | Ashby | Gem |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.4% | 5.1% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $400 / mo | $130 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
Cons
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Gem | Per seat | $130 per seat / mo |
| Lever | — | — |
| Greenhouse | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
| Workable | Flat tiers | $299 / mo |
| Ashby | Flat tiers | $400 / mo |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Gem in the latest weekly run.