Skip to content
SlateIndex
GemBetter recruiting, built on Gem.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Gem vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 5.1 for Gem, and ranks ahead in 88% of the answers that name both.

Choose Gem if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($130 vs $299)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
  • Startup discount on yearly billing

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 5.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 33% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Gem Workable
Visibility score5.1%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#19#2
Share of voice1.7%7.2%
Mentions this run1038
Positive in AI answers33%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Gem 5%

Gem 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
8.9%
34.1%
AI Mode
0.9%
29.4%
Perplexity
5.6%
26.7%
GemWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

8 engine answers name both brands

1Gem ranked higher
7Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGemWorkable
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$130 per seat / mo$299 / mo
Free planNoNo · 15-day trial
DeploymentWeb application and Chrome extensionCloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportOnshore support, success and development teamPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20172012
Headquarters—Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingSeries C · $148M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forGrowing talent acquisition teams, from startups to global enterprises, that want sourcing, ATS and CRM in one platform or AI layered onto an existing ATS.Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Gem

Gem + Your ATSCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem All-in-OneCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem Startup Program$130per month, billed yearly
Gem pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Gem

  • Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
  • Startup discount on yearly billing
  • Candidate sourcing and interview management
  • Career websites and candidate engagement

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Gem vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gem-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.