Skip to content
SlateIndex
GemBetter recruiting, built on Gem.
vs
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Gem vs Greenhouse

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 5.1 for Gem, and ranks ahead in 88% of the answers that name both.

Choose Gem if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
  • Startup discount on yearly billing

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 5.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Gem Greenhouse
Visibility score5.1%38.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#19#1
Share of voice1.7%8.1%
Mentions this run1043
Positive in AI answers33%56%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Gem 5%

Gem 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
8.9%
43.5%
AI Mode
0.9%
33.5%
Perplexity
5.6%
38.3%
GemGreenhouse

Head to head in AI answers

8 engine answers name both brands

1Gem ranked higher
7Greenhouse ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGemGreenhouse
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$130 per seat / moContact sales
Free planNoNo
DeploymentWeb application and Chrome extension—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS
SupportOnshore support, success and development team—
Founded20172012
Headquarters—New York City, NY, United States
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingSeries C · $148M raisedSeries D · $110M raised
Best forGrowing talent acquisition teams, from startups to global enterprises, that want sourcing, ATS and CRM in one platform or AI layered onto an existing ATS.Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises

Plans side by side

Gem

Gem + Your ATSCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem All-in-OneCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem Startup Program$130per month, billed yearly
Gem pricing

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Gem

  • Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
  • Startup discount on yearly billing
  • Candidate sourcing and interview management
  • Career websites and candidate engagement

    Greenhouse

    • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
    • Strong reporting and data visibility
    • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
    • Integration ecosystem and unified data
    • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Gem vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gem-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.