GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
MouseflowAI Powered Behavior Analytics. Remove Friction. Drive Growth.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Glassbox vs Mouseflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glassbox is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.4 versus 0.3 for Mouseflow.
Choose Glassbox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.4 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Mouseflow if…
- You need GDPR or CCPA or LGPD or PCI DSS or HIPAA (US data center) or EU-US DPF coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Glassbox | Mouseflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.4% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #17 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 83% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glassbox 0pp · Mouseflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glassbox leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GlassboxMouseflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Glassbox ranked higher
0Mouseflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glassbox | Mouseflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. | A small JavaScript snippet added before the closing body tag of a website |
| Integrations | — | 42+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 | GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, HIPAA (US data center), EU-US DPF |
| Support | — | In-app chat, Live chat and email support, Personalized onboarding and training for enterprise customers, Dedicated customer success manager on higher plans |
| Founded | 2010 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised | Seed |
| Best for | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. | Marketing, CRO, eCommerce, UX and analytics teams that need to see why website visitors drop off |
Plans side by side
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Mouseflow
Free$0month
Essential$25month
Advanced$109month
Premium$319month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
Mouseflow
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs Mouseflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-mouseflow, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.