GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
Simple AnalyticsA focused web analytics tool for teams that need the full picture without tracking people.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Glassbox vs Simple Analytics
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glassbox is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.4 versus 4.3 for Simple Analytics.
Choose Glassbox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.4 vs 4.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Simple Analytics if…
- You need GDPR compliant (vendor states) coverage
- simple pricing
- annual plan savings and free months
- privacy-friendly analytics
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Glassbox | Simple Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.4% | 4.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #17 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 83% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glassbox 0pp · Simple Analytics 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glassbox leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GlassboxSimple Analytics
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Glassbox ranked higher
0Simple Analytics ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glassbox | Simple Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. | SaaS, with data stored and processed in the Netherlands (EU) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 | GDPR compliant (vendor states) |
| Support | — | Contact form, Demo booking, Assisted 30-day proof of concept alongside GA4 |
| Founded | 2010 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised | Other Investors (Web3 Foundation grant program), undated |
| Best for | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. | Teams that need pageviews without consent banners or personal data, and analysts who want an independent traffic count next to GA4. |
Plans side by side
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Simple Analytics
Free$0month
Self-serve$20month (100k pageviews; scales with usage)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
Simple Analytics
- simple pricing
- annual plan savings and free months
- privacy-friendly analytics
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs Simple Analytics”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-simple-analytics, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.