GoAccessVisual Web Log Analyzer
vs
HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
GoAccess vs Heap
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Heap is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.7 for GoAccess.
Choose GoAccess if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose Heap if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (15% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GoAccess | Heap |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #34 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 1.8% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 15% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GoAccess 0pp · Heap 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Heap leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GoAccessHeap
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0GoAccess ranked higher
0Heap ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GoAccess | Heap |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Runs in a terminal on *nix systems or through a browser, and can run against an access log file or live log input. | Cloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018 |
| Support | — | Email support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap Community |
| Funding | — | Series D · $205M raised |
| Best for | System administrators who need fast visual statistics and security monitoring from web server logs, including over SSH. | Product and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event tagging |
Plans side by side
GoAccess
Pricing not available.
Heap
Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GoAccess
Profile in progress.
Heap
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
- Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
- Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
- Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
- Free tier available
- Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
- Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoAccess vs Heap”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/goaccess-vs-heap, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.