Skip to content
SlateIndex
GoAccessVisual Web Log Analyzer
vs
HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2

GoAccess vs Heap

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Heap is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.7 for GoAccess.

Choose GoAccess if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

Choose Heap if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.7)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (15% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric GoAccess Heap
Visibility score0.7%3.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Web Analytics#34#20
Share of voice0.3%1.8%
Mentions this run19
Positive in AI answers0%15%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2GoAccess 1%

GoAccess 0pp · Heap 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Heap leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
1.9%
AI Mode
2%
3%
Perplexity
0%
5%
GoAccessHeap

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0GoAccess ranked higher
0Heap ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGoAccessHeap
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Contact sales
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentRuns in a terminal on *nix systems or through a browser, and can run against an access log file or live log input.Cloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site
Integrations—100+
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018
Support—Email support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap Community
Funding—Series D · $205M raised
Best forSystem administrators who need fast visual statistics and security monitoring from web server logs, including over SSH.Product and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event tagging

Plans side by side

GoAccess

Pricing not available.

Heap

Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Heap pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

GoAccess

Profile in progress.

Heap

  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)
  • Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
  • Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
  • Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
  • Free tier available
  • Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
  • Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoAccess vs Heap”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/goaccess-vs-heap, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.