GongSales Enablement
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Gong vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Gong is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 11.6 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Gong if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (11.6 vs 1.5)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO/IEC 42001 or PCI DSS or CSA STAR Registry or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Strong conversation intelligence for call capture and analysis
Choose Qwilr if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 39% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Gong | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 11.6% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #9 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 3.8% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 22 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 39% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Gong 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Gong leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GongQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Gong ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Gong | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 300+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 42001, PCI DSS, CSA STAR Registry, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | — | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series E · $584M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Sales, revenue and enablement teams at enterprises, including high-performing revenue teams in every industry | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Gong
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Gong
- Strong conversation intelligence for call capture and analysis
- Useful coaching insights from sales calls
- Deal inspection and revenue insights
- Seen as an industry heavyweight and critical enablement infrastructure
- Less suited than dedicated tools for sequencing alone
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Gong vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gong-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.