Gong vs Reply.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Reply.io is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 5.6 for Gong, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Gong if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO/IEC 42001 or PCI DSS or CSA STAR Registry or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Strong conversation intelligence for call capture and analysis
- Useful coaching insights from sales calls
Choose Reply.io if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 5.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 39% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Gong | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 14.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−3.3% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #19 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 3.5% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 39% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Gong −0.6000000000000005pp · Reply.io −3.299999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Reply.io leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Gong | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best sales engagement platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #6 | #5 |
| Which Sales Engagement vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #7 | #9 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #11 | #2 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #15 | #5 |
| Official website of the top sales engagement platform vendors | ChatGPT | #6 | #8 |
| Official website of the top sales engagement platform vendors | Perplexity | #7 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Gong | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $49 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Integrations | 300+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 42001, PCI DSS, CSA STAR Registry, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | — | Live chat, Email, CSM onboarding |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | San Jose, California, US |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series E · $584M raised | Series A |
| Best for | Sales, revenue and enablement teams at enterprises, including high-performing revenue teams in every industry | Founders, sales teams, and agencies who need results fast without juggling 5+ tools. |
Plans side by side
Gong
Pricing not available.
Reply.io
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Gong
- Strong conversation intelligence for call capture and analysis
- Useful coaching insights from sales calls
- Deal inspection and revenue insights
- Seen as an industry heavyweight and critical enablement infrastructure
- Less suited than dedicated tools for sequencing alone
Reply.io
- Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more
- 14-day free trial to test core sequencing and automation
- Transparent self-serve pricing with annual discounts
- Affordable, lower-cost option
- Strong choice for smaller and mid-market sales teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Gong vs Reply.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gong-vs-reply-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.