Skip to content
SlateIndex
GrafanaFull-stack observability for the agentic era
vs
LokiObservability
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Grafana vs Loki

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Grafana is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.8 versus 12 for Loki, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Grafana if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.8 vs 12)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 7% positive)
  • You need FedRAMP or NATSEC100 or PCI DSS or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
  • Permanent free tier

Choose Loki if…

  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or TISAX or FedRAMP High or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • Open-source, standards-driven telemetry stack
  • Composable dashboards and data visualization
  • Built natively around OpenTelemetry

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Grafana Loki
Visibility score47.8%12%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#2#11
Share of voice9.8%4.7%
Mentions this run5827
Positive in AI answers46%7%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Grafana 48%

Grafana 0pp · Loki 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Grafana leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
57%
11.8%
AI Mode
43.1%
20.2%
Perplexity
43.1%
3.9%
GrafanaLoki

Head to head in AI answers

27 engine answers name both brands

27Grafana ranked higher
0Loki ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGrafanaLoki
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry priceFree; paid from $19 / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentFully managed Grafana Cloud on Public Cloud, Federal Cloud or Bring Your Own Cloud, plus self-managed Grafana EnterpriseSelf-hosted or through Grafana Cloud
ComplianceFedRAMP, NATSEC100, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001, CSA STARSOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, TISAX, CSA STAR, FedRAMP High, TX-RAMP Level 2
SupportCommunity support (Free plan), 8x5 email support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan)—
Founded20142018
HeadquartersNew York, NYNew York, NY
Employees1,001–5,0001,001–5,000
FundingSeries E · $1100M raisedSeries E · $660M raised
Best forTeams that want open-standard observability without lock-in, from startups to Fortune 500 enterprises—

Plans side by side

Grafana

Free$0month
Pro$19month + usage
Enterprise$25,000year spend commit (starting)
Grafana pricing

Loki

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Grafana

  • Permanent free tier
  • Open, composable, flexible platform
  • Strong open-source, Prometheus and OpenTelemetry support
  • Cost-effective, good value
  • Managed hosting
  • Complex multi-dimensional usage-based billing
  • Self-hosting demands significant engineering maintenance
  • Capped free-tier limits

Loki

  • Open-source, standards-driven telemetry stack
  • Composable dashboards and data visualization
  • Built natively around OpenTelemetry
  • Managed cloud offering with a permanent free tier
  • Cost-effective compared with licensed platforms
  • Requires internal engineering time to maintain, configure, and scale
  • Ongoing infrastructure, storage, and maintenance costs

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Grafana vs Loki”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/grafana-vs-loki, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.