Skip to content
SlateIndex
LokiObservability
vs
New RelicIntelligent Observability resolves issues at scale before they impact your bottom line.
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Loki vs New Relic

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

New Relic is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.1 versus 12 for Loki, and ranks ahead in 58% of the answers that name both.

Choose Loki if…

  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or TISAX or CSA STAR or FedRAMP High or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • Open-source, standards-driven telemetry stack
  • Composable dashboards and data visualization
  • Built natively around OpenTelemetry

Choose New Relic if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.1 vs 12)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 7% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts) or HIPAA eligibility or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 AI certification coverage
  • Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Loki New Relic
Visibility score12%47.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#11#3
Share of voice4.7%10.7%
Mentions this run2763
Positive in AI answers7%42%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Loki 12%

Loki 0pp · New Relic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

New Relic leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.8%
51.3%
AI Mode
20.2%
43.9%
Perplexity
3.9%
46.1%
LokiNew Relic

Head to head in AI answers

24 engine answers name both brands

10Loki ranked higher
14New Relic ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLokiNew Relic
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Free; paid from $10 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentSelf-hosted or through Grafana CloudCloud-based SaaS
Integrations—800+
ComplianceSOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, TISAX, CSA STAR, FedRAMP High, TX-RAMP Level 2SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Moderate (eligible accounts), HIPAA eligibility, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 AI certification
Support—Ticketed support, 2-hour critical initial response SLA on Pro, 1-hour critical initial response SLA and priority ticket routing on Enterprise
Founded20182008
HeadquartersNew York, NYSan Francisco, CA, United States
Employees1,001–5,0001,001–5,000
FundingSeries E · $660M raisedPost-IPO raise (not corroborated by other sources)
Best for—Engineers responsible for application and system uptime and reliability, and teams that want full-stack observability starting from a free tier.

Plans side by side

Loki

Pricing not available.

New Relic

Free$0per month, one full platform user and 100 GB ingest
Standard$10per first full platform user/month; $99 per additional user (max 5)
Pro$349per full platform user/month (annual commitment); $418.80 monthly pay as you go
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
New Relic pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Loki

  • Open-source, standards-driven telemetry stack
  • Composable dashboards and data visualization
  • Built natively around OpenTelemetry
  • Managed cloud offering with a permanent free tier
  • Cost-effective compared with licensed platforms
  • Requires internal engineering time to maintain, configure, and scale
  • Ongoing infrastructure, storage, and maintenance costs

New Relic

  • Generous permanent free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest
  • Easy setup and quick APM start with minimal upfront cost
  • Unified, consumption-based pricing model
  • Strong full-stack observability platform and APM pioneer
  • Value and accessibility with AI-assisted querying and diagnostics
  • Costs can surprise as log and trace volume scales
  • Pricing requires careful cost governance and depends on usage

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loki vs New Relic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loki-vs-new-relic, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.