GrafanaFull-stack observability for the agentic era
vs
PresetAI-native business intelligence built on Apache Superset
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2
Grafana vs Preset
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Preset is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 0.9 versus 0 for Grafana.
Choose Grafana if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $20)
- AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 0% positive)
- You need FedRAMP or NATSEC100 or PCI DSS or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Preset if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.9 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Grafana | Preset |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Business Intelligence | #44 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Grafana 0pp · Preset 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Preset leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GrafanaPreset
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Grafana ranked higher
0Preset ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Grafana | Preset |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | Free; paid from $20 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Fully managed Grafana Cloud on Public Cloud, Federal Cloud or Bring Your Own Cloud, plus self-managed Grafana Enterprise | Cloud-hosted SaaS, managed private cloud, on-prem, or embedded analytics |
| Compliance | FedRAMP, NATSEC100, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001, CSA STAR | SOC 2 |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), 8x5 email support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan) | Standard customer support, Dedicated support via Slack, Enterprise SLA |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | San Mateo, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series E · $1100M raised | Series C · $48M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want open-standard observability without lock-in, from startups to Fortune 500 enterprises | Small teams starting free, and organizations that want managed Apache Superset with the option to migrate to open-source Superset. |
Plans side by side
Preset
Starter$0forever, up to 5 users
Professional$20user/month, billed annually ($25 billed monthly)
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Grafana
- Permanent free tier
- Open, composable, flexible platform
- Strong open-source, Prometheus and OpenTelemetry support
- Cost-effective, good value
- Managed hosting
- Complex multi-dimensional usage-based billing
- Self-hosting demands significant engineering maintenance
- Capped free-tier limits
Preset
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Grafana vs Preset”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/grafana-vs-preset, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.