Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
iCIMSIntelligent hiring platform powered by billions of hiring interactions and decades of hiring expertise
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs iCIMS

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 13.8 for iCIMS, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 13.8)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 25% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards

Choose iCIMS if…

  • You need Independent Responsible AI certification coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • enterprise-grade, high-volume talent acquisition platform
  • robust analytics and AI screening and tracking

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse iCIMS
Visibility score38.5%13.8%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#11
Share of voice8.1%3.8%
Mentions this run4320
Positive in AI answers56%25%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · iCIMS 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
18.1%
AI Mode
33.5%
13%
Perplexity
38.3%
10.4%
GreenhouseiCIMS

Head to head in AI answers

20 engine answers name both brands

15Greenhouse ranked higher
5iCIMS ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseiCIMS
Pricing modelFlat tiers—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planNo—
Integrations—10000+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSIndependent Responsible AI certification
Support—Phone support: +1 (800) 889-4422, Customer community
Founded2012—
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesHolmdel, New Jersey, United States
Employees501–1,0001,001–5,000
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedPrivate equity round, TA Associates
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesLarge enterprises that need to hire at scale

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

iCIMS

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    iCIMS

    • enterprise-grade, high-volume talent acquisition platform
    • robust analytics and AI screening and tracking
    • recognised market leader in enterprise recruiting
    • suited to complex, multi-location hiring at scale

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs iCIMS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-icims, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.