GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
PCRecruiterRecruitment CRM and ATS for growing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Greenhouse vs PCRecruiter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 0 for PCRecruiter.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
Choose PCRecruiter if…
- You need SOC 2 Examined coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | PCRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #79 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · PCRecruiter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GreenhousePCRecruiter
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Greenhouse ranked higher
0PCRecruiter ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | PCRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $125 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | — | Private, single tenant database hosted by the vendor on infrastructure it owns; self-hosting is also available. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Examined |
| Support | — | US-based phone support, answered in under 30 seconds on average, Support ticket to the same US-based team, First training session within one business day of onboarding call |
| Founded | 2012 | 1998 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | — |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | — |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Boutique and growing permanent placement agencies, typically with 1 to 25 recruiters. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
PCRecruiter
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs PCRecruiter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-pcrecruiter, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.