Greenhouse vs Recruitee
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 3.5 for Recruitee, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 3.5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 14% positive)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Recruitee if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Visual, drag-and-drop pipeline interface
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 14% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · Recruitee 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | AI Mode | #1 | #5 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #2 | #18 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #1 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Integrations | — | 200+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | — | Live chat and localized support, Onboarding support, Dedicated customer success manager, Help center |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Growth equity (PSG) |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Growing teams that want to automate hiring, and HR teams that need advanced analytics, compliance and integrations. |
Plans side by side
Recruitee
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Recruitee
- Visual, drag-and-drop pipeline interface
- Pricing is high at advanced tiers, from $99 to $199+ per user per month
- One-year minimum commitment for the annual-billing discount
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Recruitee”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-recruitee, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.