Skip to content
SlateIndex
HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
vs
Quantum MetricExperience context for AI
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3

Heap vs Quantum Metric

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Heap is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 36.1 versus 1.5 for Quantum Metric, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Heap if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (36.1 vs 1.5)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)

Choose Quantum Metric if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 15% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or HITRUST coverage
  • Blends quantitative product analytics with qualitative context like session replays and error monitoring
  • Strong recognition from analysts and research

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Heap Quantum Metric
Visibility score36.1%1.5%
Change vs last weekup+9.1%New
Rank in Product Analytics#4#21
Share of voice11.1%0.9%
Mentions this run524
Positive in AI answers15%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Heap 36%

Heap +9.100000000000001pp · Quantum Metric +1.5pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Heap leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43%
2%
AI Mode
31.3%
2.4%
Perplexity
34.1%
0%
HeapQuantum Metric

Head to head in AI answers

4 engine answers name both brands

4Heap ranked higher
0Quantum Metric ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionHeapQuantum Metric
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesContact sales
Free planYesNo
DeploymentCloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the siteCloud-based service
Integrations100+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, HITRUST
SupportEmail support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap CommunityDedicated account management and customer success team, Onboarding under industry-specific playbooks, Expert-led and self-guided training, Ongoing consultation with customer success experts
Founded—2015
Headquarters—Colorado Springs, Colorado, US
Employees—201–500
FundingSeries D · $205M raisedSeries B
Best forProduct and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event taggingEnterprise CX, product, UX, marketing and development teams in retail, financial services, travel and hospitality, telco, gaming and healthcare.

Plans side by side

Heap

Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Heap pricing

Quantum Metric

EnterpriseCustomcustom quote (based on session volume and digital properties)
Quantum Metric pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Heap

  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)
  • Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
  • Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
  • Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
  • Free tier available
  • Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
  • Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions

Quantum Metric

  • Blends quantitative product analytics with qualitative context like session replays and error monitoring
  • Strong recognition from analysts and research
  • Best for enterprise digital experience and session replay

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Heap vs Quantum Metric”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/heap-vs-quantum-metric, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.