Heap vs UXCam
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Heap is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 36.1 versus 1.9 for UXCam, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Heap if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (36.1 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (15% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
Choose UXCam if…
- You need SOC 1 or GDPR or HIPAA (signs a BAA) coverage
- Strong for mobile-first products needing screen-level and touch-level analysis
- Offers a 14-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Heap | UXCam |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 36.1% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+9.1% | down−1.2% |
| Rank in Product Analytics | #4 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 11.1% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 52 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 15% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Heap +9.100000000000001pp · UXCam −1.2000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Heap leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Heap | UXCam |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Product Analytics tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #4 | #9 |
| Compare the leading Product Analytics platforms | Perplexity | #3 | #8 |
| Official website of the top product analytics tool vendors | Perplexity | #4 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Heap | UXCam |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site | Cloud-hosted, with data hosting in the EU, USA or UAE |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018 | SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (signs a BAA) |
| Support | Email support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap Community | Guided onboarding and integration support, Demo with an expert |
| Founded | — | 2014 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $205M raised | Seed (led by Headline) · $5M raised |
| Best for | Product and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event tagging | Product managers, growth marketers, engineers and customer support teams working on mobile apps and websites |
Plans side by side
Heap
UXCam
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Heap
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
- Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
- Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
- Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
- Free tier available
- Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
- Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions
UXCam
- Strong for mobile-first products needing screen-level and touch-level analysis
- Offers a 14-day free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Heap vs UXCam”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/heap-vs-uxcam, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.