hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
hireEZ vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 2.5 for hireEZ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose hireEZ if…
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 2.5)
- You want a lower entry price ($299 vs $494)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 40+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 29% positive)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | hireEZ | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.5% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #33 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
hireEZ 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
hireEZWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
0hireEZ ranked higher
5Workable ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | hireEZ | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #8 | #3 |
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #12 | #6 |
| Compare the leading recruiting platforms | ChatGPT | #15 | #7 |
| Best recruiting platform with AI features | Perplexity | #6 | #1 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #21 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | hireEZ | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $494 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 40+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | — | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, California, US | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series C | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “hireEZ vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hireez-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.