Skip to content
SlateIndex
hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

hireEZ vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 2.5 for hireEZ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose hireEZ if…

  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • AI-powered outbound sourcing
  • cross-platform talent mapping
  • diversity hiring support

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 2.5)
  • You want a lower entry price ($299 vs $494)
  • You need more native integrations (270+ vs 40+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 29% positive)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric hireEZ Workable
Visibility score2.5%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#33#2
Share of voice1.1%7.2%
Mentions this run638
Positive in AI answers29%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3hireEZ 3%

hireEZ 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
4.4%
34.1%
AI Mode
0.9%
29.4%
Perplexity
2.2%
26.7%
hireEZWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

0hireEZ ranked higher
5Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionhireEZWorkable
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$494 per seat / mo$299 / mo
Free planNo · 7-day trialNo · 15-day trial
DeploymentLayered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks.Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations40+270+
Compliance—ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
Support—Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20152012
HeadquartersMountain View, California, USBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingSeries CSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forEnterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out.Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

hireEZ

Solo$494per month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
hireEZ pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

hireEZ

  • AI-powered outbound sourcing
  • cross-platform talent mapping
  • diversity hiring support
  • AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
  • per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “hireEZ vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hireez-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.