HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
vs
SpyFuWin in AI & Google Search
Comparison · SEO Tools · weekly run Nov 2
HubSpot vs SpyFu
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in SEO Tools: it has a visibility score of 10.5 versus 2 for SpyFu, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.5 vs 2)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (35% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
Choose SpyFu if…
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- competitor keyword intelligence
- PPC intelligence
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | HubSpot | SpyFu |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.5% | 2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in SEO Tools | #9 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 3.9% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 35% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HubSpot 0pp · SpyFu 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HubSpotSpyFu
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0HubSpot ranked higher
2SpyFu ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | HubSpot | SpyFu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading SEO Tools platforms | Perplexity | #12 | #9 |
| Official website of the top SEO tool vendors | Perplexity | #21 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HubSpot | SpyFu |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo | $39 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Onboarding fee | $3,000 | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Runs on dedicated bare-metal servers from phoenixNAP |
| Integrations | 2000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 | — |
| Support | Phone | Email, Live chat, Phone |
| Founded | 2006 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States | Scottsdale, Arizona, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 11–50 |
| Funding | Corporate round | Other Investors (latest listed round) |
| Best for | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. | Marketers and agencies doing competitor SEO and Google Ads research |
Plans side by side
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
SpyFu
- competitor keyword intelligence
- PPC intelligence
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HubSpot vs SpyFu”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hubspot-vs-spyfu, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.