Skip to content
SlateIndex
iCIMSIntelligent hiring platform powered by billions of hiring interactions and decades of hiring expertise
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

iCIMS vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 13.8 for iCIMS, and ranks ahead in 60% of the answers that name both.

Choose iCIMS if…

  • You need more native integrations (10000+ vs 270+)
  • You need Independent Responsible AI certification coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • enterprise-grade, high-volume talent acquisition platform

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 13.8)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 25% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • fast deployment and ease of use

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric iCIMS Workable
Visibility score13.8%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#11#2
Share of voice3.8%7.2%
Mentions this run2038
Positive in AI answers25%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3iCIMS 14%

iCIMS 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
18.1%
34.1%
AI Mode
13%
29.4%
Perplexity
10.4%
26.7%
iCIMSWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

10 engine answers name both brands

4iCIMS ranked higher
6Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensioniCIMSWorkable
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$299 / mo
Free plan—No · 15-day trial
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations10000+270+
ComplianceIndependent Responsible AI certificationISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportPhone support: +1 (800) 889-4422, Customer communityPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded—2012
HeadquartersHolmdel, New Jersey, United StatesBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees1,001–5,000201–500
FundingPrivate equity round, TA AssociatesSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forLarge enterprises that need to hire at scaleCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

iCIMS

Pricing not available.

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

iCIMS

  • enterprise-grade, high-volume talent acquisition platform
  • robust analytics and AI screening and tracking
  • recognised market leader in enterprise recruiting
  • suited to complex, multi-location hiring at scale

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “iCIMS vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/icims-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.