Skip to content
SlateIndex
IroncladThe AI CLM that unlocks intelligence from every contract.
vs
LoopioAI RFP Software Built for the People Behind Every RFP
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Ironclad vs Loopio

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Ironclad is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 15 versus 6 for Loopio, and ranks ahead in 60% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ironclad if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15 vs 6)
  • You need SOC 1 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or GDPR or HIPAA or CSA Trusted Provider coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management

Choose Loopio if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 45% positive)
  • You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
  • Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
  • Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Ironclad Loopio
Visibility score15%6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#9#15
Share of voice4.3%2.2%
Mentions this run2312
Positive in AI answers45%46%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Ironclad 15%

Ironclad 0pp · Loopio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Ironclad leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
24.4%
2.6%
AI Mode
9.6%
6.7%
Perplexity
10.9%
8.9%
IroncladLoopio

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

3Ironclad ranked higher
2Loopio ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionIroncladLoopio
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Contact sales
Free plan—No
DeploymentCloud-basedCloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web Services
Integrations8000+—
ComplianceSOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, GDPR, HIPAA, CSA Trusted ProviderSOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant
SupportHelp Center, Academy, Community, Dedicated customer success teamOnboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app support
Founded20142014
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaToronto, Canada
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingSeries E · $333M raisedStrategic investment from Sumeru Equity Partners
Best forEnterprises whose legal, procurement, sales and IT teams all need to manage contracts in one system.Proposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires.

Plans side by side

Ironclad

Pricing not available.

Loopio

FoundationsCustom
EnhancedCustom
EnterpriseCustom
Loopio pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Ironclad

  • Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management
  • Named a market leader for digital contracting workflows
  • Robust repository search and tracking
  • Approval, negotiation, and routing automation
  • Suited to enterprise legal contract governance

    Loopio

    • Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
    • Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
    • Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ironclad vs Loopio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ironclad-vs-loopio, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.