Skip to content
SlateIndex
IroncladThe AI CLM that unlocks intelligence from every contract.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Ironclad vs Qwilr

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 15 for Ironclad, and ranks ahead in 82% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ironclad if…

  • You need SOC 1 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or GDPR or HIPAA or CSA Trusted Provider coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management
  • Named a market leader for digital contracting workflows

Choose Qwilr if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 15)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 45% positive)
  • You need PCI-DSS coverage
  • Interactive, web-based proposals

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Ironclad Qwilr
Visibility score15%28.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#9#4
Share of voice4.3%7.2%
Mentions this run2337
Positive in AI answers45%51%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Ironclad 15%

Ironclad 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
24.4%
30.2%
AI Mode
9.6%
26.9%
Perplexity
10.9%
27.8%
IroncladQwilr

Head to head in AI answers

11 engine answers name both brands

2Ironclad ranked higher
9Qwilr ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionIroncladQwilr
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$35 per seat / mo
Free plan—No · 14-day trial
DeploymentCloud-basedWeb-based, web-native software
Integrations8000+—
ComplianceSOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, GDPR, HIPAA, CSA Trusted ProviderSOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS
SupportHelp Center, Academy, Community, Dedicated customer success teamEmail support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions
Founded20142014
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaRedfern, New South Wales, Australia
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingSeries E · $333M raisedSeries A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised
Best forEnterprises whose legal, procurement, sales and IT teams all need to manage contracts in one system.Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.

Plans side by side

Ironclad

Pricing not available.

Qwilr

Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Qwilr pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Ironclad

  • Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management
  • Named a market leader for digital contracting workflows
  • Robust repository search and tracking
  • Approval, negotiation, and routing automation
  • Suited to enterprise legal contract governance

    Qwilr

    • Interactive, web-based proposals
    • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
    • Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
    • Lower cost with annual billing
    • 14-day free trial available

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ironclad vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ironclad-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.