JazzHREasy-to-use recruiting software for small business
vs
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
JazzHR vs SeekOut
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
JazzHR is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 5.3 for SeekOut, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose JazzHR if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 5.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 25% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose SeekOut if…
- You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $1,000)
- You need GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | JazzHR | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.4% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #9 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 22 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 25% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
JazzHR 0pp · SeekOut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
JazzHR leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
JazzHRSeekOut
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
2JazzHR ranked higher
2SeekOut ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | JazzHR | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #16 | #11 |
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #4 | #8 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #24 | #22 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #9 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | JazzHR | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $1,000 / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 |
| Support | Contact the support team through the website, All-Access Support on the Pro plan | Help center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan |
| Founded | — | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Denver, Colorado, US | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round led by Volition Capital | Series C · $189M raised |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized businesses and lean teams that need an easy-to-use applicant tracking system | Solo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel |
Plans side by side
JazzHR
Hero$1,000per year, billed annually
Plus$3,480per year, billed annually
Pro$5,508per year, billed annually
SeekOut
SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
JazzHR
- Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
- Budget-friendly option for small teams
- Unlimited users and flat entry pricing
- Low administrative drag for early-stage teams
- Annual plans save up to 24%
SeekOut
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
- Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “JazzHR vs SeekOut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jazzhr-vs-seekout, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.