Skip to content
SlateIndex
JazzHREasy-to-use recruiting software for small business
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

JazzHR vs TestGorilla

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

JazzHR is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.

Choose JazzHR if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 0.6)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams

Choose TestGorilla if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric JazzHR TestGorilla
Visibility score14.4%0.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#9#59
Share of voice4.3%0.4%
Mentions this run222
Positive in AI answers36%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3JazzHR 14%

JazzHR 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

JazzHR leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.1%
0.9%
AI Mode
18%
0.9%
Perplexity
14.1%
0%
JazzHRTestGorilla

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0JazzHR ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionJazzHRTestGorilla
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry price$1,000 / moFree; paid from $74 per seat / mo
Free planNoYes
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant
SupportContact the support team through the website, All-Access Support on the Pro planHelp center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides
Founded—2020
HeadquartersDenver, Colorado, USAmsterdam, Netherlands
Employees51–200201–500
FundingRound led by Volition CapitalSeries A · $80M raised
Best forSmall and mid-sized businesses and lean teams that need an easy-to-use applicant tracking systemSmall companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan).

Plans side by side

JazzHR

Hero$1,000per year, billed annually
Plus$3,480per year, billed annually
Pro$5,508per year, billed annually
JazzHR pricing

TestGorilla

Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
TestGorilla pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

JazzHR

  • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
  • Budget-friendly option for small teams
  • Unlimited users and flat entry pricing
  • Low administrative drag for early-stage teams
  • Annual plans save up to 24%

    TestGorilla

    • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “JazzHR vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jazzhr-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.