Jotform SignFree electronic signature software for creating, sharing and e-signing documents
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Jotform Sign vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 3.5 for Jotform Sign, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Jotform Sign if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need PCI DSS Service Provider Level 1 or GDPR compliance or CCPA compliance or HIPAA-enabled forms or SOC 2 (Enterprise environment) or FERPA compliance coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 3.5)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Jotform Sign | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.5% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #21 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Jotform Sign 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Jotform SignQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0Jotform Sign ranked higher
3Qwilr ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Jotform Sign | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is a proposal and contract tool and when does a company need one? | Perplexity | #3 | #1 |
| What are the best Proposals & Contracts tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #13 | #3 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | Perplexity | #11 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Jotform Sign | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on Google Cloud and AWS, with no in-house servers | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 150+ | — |
| Compliance | PCI DSS Service Provider Level 1, GDPR compliance, CCPA compliance, HIPAA-enabled forms, SOC 2 (Enterprise environment), FERPA compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | 24/7 customer support team | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth (unverified, sources conflict) | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Individuals, small teams and businesses that want e-signatures alongside forms and workflow automation | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Jotform Sign
Starter$0month
Bronze$19month
SilverCustommonth
GoldCustommonth
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Jotform Sign
- free plan for signing documents
- useful for workflows that start with forms
- monthly document and submission limits
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Jotform Sign vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jotform-sign-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.