JuiceboxThe AI Recruiting Platform that learns how you search, so you source better talent, faster.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Juicebox vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 2 for Juicebox.
Choose Juicebox if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 44% positive)
- You need GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 2)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 100+)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Juicebox | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #39 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Juicebox 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
JuiceboxWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Juicebox ranked higher
0Workable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Juicebox | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $99 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 100+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Knowledge base, Help center, Chat and email support, Priority support (email, chat, Slack) with 24-hour response times on the Business plan | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed · $116M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Recruiters and talent teams searching for hard-to-find talent, from startups and enterprises to recruiting agencies. | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Juicebox
Free$0per seat/month
Starter$99per seat/month
Growth$179per seat/month
BusinessCustomcustom, annual only
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Juicebox
- quick online setup
- free starting option
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Juicebox vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/juicebox-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.