Keeper Security vs Keycloak
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Keycloak is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.6 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
Choose Keycloak if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.6 vs 0.5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keeper Security | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.5% | 5.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.1% | down−0.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #36 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 2.1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Keycloak leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keeper Security | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe | — |
| Support | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | — |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised | — |
| Best for | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications |
Plans side by side
Keeper Security
Keycloak
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs Keycloak”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-keycloak, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.