CyberArk vs Keeper Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 0.5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or IRAP or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 0.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | down−0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | CyberArk | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #10 | #13 |
| Which Identity & Access Management tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #7 | #5 |
| Which Identity & Access Management tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #7 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University |
| Founded | 1999 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform |
Plans side by side
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs Keeper Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-keeper-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.