Skip to content
SlateIndex
Keeper SecurityThe identity security platform for humans, machines and AI agents
vs
SaviyntSecure every identity - Human, machine, AI agent.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Keeper Security vs Saviynt

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Saviynt is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.1 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Keeper Security if…

  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage

Choose Saviynt if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.1 vs 0.5)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (30% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or FedRAMP or PCI DSS or IRAP or Cyber Essentials Plus or EU-US DPF coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Keeper Security Saviynt
Visibility score0.5%5.1%
Change vs last weekdown−0.1%up+1.1%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#36#18
Share of voice0.3%2.5%
Mentions this run18
Positive in AI answers0%30%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Keeper Security 1%

Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · Saviynt +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Saviynt leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.2%
12.5%
AI Mode
0%
3.3%
Perplexity
0.9%
6.8%
Keeper SecuritySaviynt

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Keeper Security ranked higher
1Saviynt ranked higher
PromptEngineKeeper SecuritySaviynt
Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? ChatGPT#13#7

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionKeeper SecuritySaviynt
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planNo—
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)Cloud (SaaS)
Integrations100+—
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTeSOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, IRAP, Cyber Essentials Plus, EU-US DPF, FIPS 140-3
SupportPhone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper UniversityCustomer Support, Knowledge Exchange, Saviynt University
Founded20112010
HeadquartersChicago, Illinois, United StatesEl Segundo, California, United States
Employees501–1,0001,001–5,000
FundingMinority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raisedSeries B extension (unconfirmed)
Best forOrganizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platformLarge enterprises and government institutions that need to govern workforce, external, privileged, non-human and AI agent identities in one platform.

Plans side by side

Keeper Security

Business Starter Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
Business Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
Enterprise Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
KeeperMSPCustomcontact sales
KeeperPAMCustomrequest a quote
Keeper Security pricing

Saviynt

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Keeper Security

Profile in progress.

Saviynt

  • Strong identity governance and compliance capabilities
  • Highly rated by Gartner Peer Insights and KuppingerCole
  • Suited to large, complex enterprise environments
  • Good for cloud governance
  • Strong access certification and segregation of duties controls
  • Heavyweight platform with higher cost profile
  • Enterprise contracts are typically annual or multi-year

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs Saviynt”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-saviynt, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.