Keeper Security vs WorkOS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
WorkOS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 9.5 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 20+)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose WorkOS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.5 vs 0.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 0% positive)
- You need CCPA or SIG Lite coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keeper Security | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.5% | 9.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.1% | down−1.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #36 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
WorkOS leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keeper Security | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud APIs and SDKs |
| Integrations | 100+ | 20+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite |
| Support | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University | Email support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised | Seed · $195M raised |
| Best for | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform | SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations. |
Plans side by side
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
WorkOS
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
- Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
- Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
- Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
- Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
- Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.