KeycloakOpen source identity and access management
vs
OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Keycloak vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Keycloak is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.6 versus 0.6 for Omada.
Choose Keycloak if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.6 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
Choose Omada if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keycloak | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.3% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #15 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 2.1% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Keycloak leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
KeycloakOmada
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Keycloak ranked higher
0Omada ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keycloak | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2014 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | — | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.