Keycloak vs Saviynt
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Keycloak is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.6 versus 5.1 for Saviynt, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keycloak if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.6 vs 5.1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 30% positive)
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
Choose Saviynt if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or FedRAMP or PCI DSS or IRAP or Cyber Essentials Plus or EU-US DPF or FIPS 140-3 coverage
- Strong identity governance and compliance capabilities
- Highly rated by Gartner Peer Insights and KuppingerCole
- Suited to large, complex enterprise environments
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keycloak | Saviynt |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 5.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.3% | up+1.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #15 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 30% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · Saviynt +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Keycloak leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keycloak | Saviynt |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #8 | #11 |
| Alternatives to the most popular identity and access management platform | Perplexity | #8 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keycloak | Saviynt |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, IRAP, Cyber Essentials Plus, EU-US DPF, FIPS 140-3 |
| Support | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak | Customer Support, Knowledge Exchange, Saviynt University |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | — | El Segundo, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Series B extension (unconfirmed) |
| Best for | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications | Large enterprises and government institutions that need to govern workforce, external, privileged, non-human and AI agent identities in one platform. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Saviynt
- Strong identity governance and compliance capabilities
- Highly rated by Gartner Peer Insights and KuppingerCole
- Suited to large, complex enterprise environments
- Good for cloud governance
- Strong access certification and segregation of duties controls
- Heavyweight platform with higher cost profile
- Enterprise contracts are typically annual or multi-year
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs Saviynt”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-saviynt, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.