LeverModern recruiting software that combines ATS and CRM capabilities
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Lever vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Lever is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 22.2 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Lever if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.2 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
Choose Loxo if…
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Lever | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22.2% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #3 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 6.3% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 34 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Lever 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Lever leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LeverLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Lever ranked higher
1Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Lever | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | ChatGPT | #10 | #6 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #2 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Lever | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 7-day trial |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001 | — |
| Support | Customer Support, Phone (888) 885-5299 | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations. | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
Lever
Pricing not available.
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Lever
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
- Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
- Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lever vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lever-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.