LiveChatLive chat software that grows sales
vs
PylonThe Agentic Support Platform
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3
LiveChat vs Pylon
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LiveChat is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 40.1 versus 1.9 for Pylon, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose LiveChat if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.1 vs 1.9)
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $89)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or CCPA or WCAG 2.2 AA or PCI DSS SAQ A or Data Privacy Framework or BBB Accredited Business coverage
Choose Pylon if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or HIPAA coverage
- Best for B2B SaaS with enterprise Slack/Teams-first support
- Strong for B2B account-centric and high-touch support
- Modern, Slack-Connect and developer-centric B2B support
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LiveChat | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 40.1% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.3% | up+0.7% |
| Rank in Live Chat & AI Support | #3 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 10.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 50 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LiveChat +1.3000000000000043pp · Pylon +0.7pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LiveChat leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LiveChatPylon
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0LiveChat ranked higher
1Pylon ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | LiveChat | Pylon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top live chat tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #6 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LiveChat | Pylon |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | $89 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on Google Cloud in Texas, Iowa and Frankfurt, Germany | Cloud (AWS, US or EU hosting) |
| Integrations | 200+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, WCAG 2.2 AA, PCI DSS SAQ A, Data Privacy Framework, BBB Accredited Business | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Self-service help center, 24/7/365 support, Product Expert and dedicated team on Enterprise plan | Onboarding, Dedicated CSM, Priority support SLAs, Help Center |
| Founded | 2002 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Wrocław, Poland | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Management buyout | Series B · $51M raised |
| Best for | Small teams earning their first revenue from chat, and scaling teams that want chat to drive sales; larger organizations can use the Enterprise plan. | B2B support teams handling customers over Slack Connect, Teams and other shared channels |
Plans side by side
LiveChat
Essential$19user / month, billed annually ($25 billed monthly)
Growth$79user / month, billed annually ($99 billed monthly)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pylon
Professional$89seat/month, billed annually
Advanced$139seat/month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LiveChat
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Reliable, high-performance real-time chat
- Polished website chat and straightforward agent workflows
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Strong for e-commerce and sales-focused teams
- Can become expensive and complex for growing teams
- Free tier limited to 2 seats
- Ratings vary by review site
Pylon
- Best for B2B SaaS with enterprise Slack/Teams-first support
- Strong for B2B account-centric and high-touch support
- Modern, Slack-Connect and developer-centric B2B support
- Frequently included in shortlists of top B2B SaaS support tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LiveChat vs Pylon”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/livechat-vs-pylon, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.