Skip to content
SlateIndex
LokiObservability
vs
SigNozThe Open Source Datadog Alternative
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Loki vs SigNoz

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

SigNoz is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 12.3 versus 12 for Loki, and ranks ahead in 54% of the answers that name both.

Choose Loki if…

  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or TISAX or CSA STAR or FedRAMP High or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Open-source, standards-driven telemetry stack
  • Composable dashboards and data visualization

Choose SigNoz if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.3 vs 12)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 7% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Loki SigNoz
Visibility score12%12.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#11#10
Share of voice4.7%3.7%
Mentions this run2722
Positive in AI answers7%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Loki 12%

Loki 0pp · SigNoz 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

SigNoz leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.8%
16.1%
AI Mode
20.2%
7.6%
Perplexity
3.9%
13.2%
LokiSigNoz

Head to head in AI answers

13 engine answers name both brands

6Loki ranked higher
7SigNoz ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLokiSigNoz
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—$49 / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentSelf-hosted or through Grafana CloudSigNoz Cloud (managed, with US, EU and India regions), bring-your-own-cloud, or self-hosted
ComplianceSOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, TISAX, CSA STAR, FedRAMP High, TX-RAMP Level 2SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA
Support—Community support on Slack, Email support, In-product chat support, Dedicated Slack, email and in-product support on Enterprise plans
Founded20182020
HeadquartersNew York, NYSan Francisco, CA
Employees1,001–5,00011–50
FundingSeries E · $660M raisedUnnamed round after Y Combinator participation · $7M raised
Best for—Fast-scaling engineering teams that want usage-based pricing, and solo developers and small startups that want to self-host.

Plans side by side

Loki

Pricing not available.

SigNoz

Community (Self-Hosted)Customself-hosted
Teams (SigNoz Cloud)$49month
Enterprise$4,000month, starts at
SigNoz pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Loki

  • Open-source, standards-driven telemetry stack
  • Composable dashboards and data visualization
  • Built natively around OpenTelemetry
  • Managed cloud offering with a permanent free tier
  • Cost-effective compared with licensed platforms
  • Requires internal engineering time to maintain, configure, and scale
  • Ongoing infrastructure, storage, and maintenance costs

SigNoz

  • Cost-effective open-source alternative to Datadog and New Relic
  • Native OpenTelemetry observability platform
  • Free self-hosting and data ownership
  • Transparent, predictable pricing
  • Good fit for startups and engineering teams
  • Narrower integrations than broadest competitors
  • Requires engineering time to run

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loki vs SigNoz”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loki-vs-signoz, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.