LokiObservability
vs
UptraceCut your observability bill by 90%
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Loki vs Uptrace
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loki is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 12 versus 0.7 for Uptrace.
Choose Loki if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12 vs 0.7)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or TISAX or CSA STAR or FedRAMP High or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Open-source, standards-driven telemetry stack
Choose Uptrace if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loki | Uptrace |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 12% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #11 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 4.7% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 27 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 7% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loki 0pp · Uptrace 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loki leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LokiUptrace
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Loki ranked higher
0Uptrace ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loki | Uptrace |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted or through Grafana Cloud | Uptrace Cloud, or self-hosted with Docker, Ansible or Kubernetes, or on-premises with a license |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, TISAX, CSA STAR, FedRAMP High, TX-RAMP Level 2 | — |
| Support | — | 16/5 enterprise support across EU and US business hours, Email and scheduled calls, Dedicated support engineer on on-premises plans |
| Founded | 2018 | — |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | Chisinau, Moldova |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series E · $660M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | — | Engineering teams that run OpenTelemetry and want traces, metrics and logs in one platform at predictable cost. |
Plans side by side
Loki
Pricing not available.
Uptrace
Uptrace CloudCustomper GB ingested, usage-based; no seats or hosts
Community Edition$0free forever, self-hosted
On-premisesCustomlicense, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loki
- Open-source, standards-driven telemetry stack
- Composable dashboards and data visualization
- Built natively around OpenTelemetry
- Managed cloud offering with a permanent free tier
- Cost-effective compared with licensed platforms
- Requires internal engineering time to maintain, configure, and scale
- Ongoing infrastructure, storage, and maintenance costs
Uptrace
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loki vs Uptrace”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loki-vs-uptrace, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.