LookerAgentic business intelligence and embedded analytics on Google Cloud
vs
MastraTypeScript AI Framework for Agents and Apps
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Looker vs Mastra
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Looker is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 1.2 for Mastra, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Looker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 1.2)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
Choose Mastra if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 30% positive)
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Looker | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.4% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #13 | #56 |
| Share of voice | 2.5% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 30% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Looker 0pp · Mastra 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Looker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LookerMastra
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Looker ranked higher
0Mastra ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Looker | Mastra |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI Agents tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #10 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Looker | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $250 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Google Cloud | Self-hosted on any Node.js-compatible environment, or hosted on Mastra Cloud and Mastra Platform. |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA | — |
| Support | — | Shared Slack support channel (Enterprise), Dedicated support engineer (Enterprise), SLA support 8-5 Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm PST |
| Founded | — | 2024 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco |
| Employees | — | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series E · $280M raised | Series A · $35M raised |
| Best for | — | Developers and teams building AI agents in TypeScript and JavaScript |
Plans side by side
Looker
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
Mastra
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Looker vs Mastra”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/looker-vs-mastra, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.