LoomWe're bringing video messaging to work and empowering everyone to communicate more effectively, wherever they are.
vs
PipedriveCRM software sales teams will love
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Loom vs Pipedrive
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Pipedrive is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 2.9 versus 1.1 for Loom.
Choose Loom if…
- You need CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Async video for sharing updates and feedback
Choose Pipedrive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.9 vs 1.1)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 3 or EU-US DPF coverage
- Visual sales pipeline management
- Easy to use with quick setup
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Loom | Pipedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.1% | 2.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #32 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loom 0pp · Pipedrive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Pipedrive leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoomPipedrive
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Loom ranked higher
0Pipedrive ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loom | Pipedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, built on AWS infrastructure | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 500+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2 Type 2 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, GDPR, EU-US DPF |
| Support | Priority support on Business and Business + AI plans, Dedicated support and a dedicated account manager on Enterprise | Knowledge Base, Academy, Contact sales |
| Founded | 2016 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $204M raised | Majority buyout (Vista Equity Partners) |
| Best for | Sales, engineering, customer support and design teams that want to share context by video message instead of meetings or long emails. | Small and medium-sized sales teams wanting an easy-to-use, visual pipeline CRM |
Plans side by side
Loom
Starter$0
Business$18per user / month
Business + AI$24per user / month
EnterpriseCustom
Pipedrive
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loom
- Async video for sharing updates and feedback
Pipedrive
- Visual sales pipeline management
- Easy to use with quick setup
- Built specifically for sales teams
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Annual billing savings and clear pricing
- May lack governance, service, and advanced reporting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loom vs Pipedrive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loom-vs-pipedrive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.