LoomWe're bringing video messaging to work and empowering everyone to communicate more effectively, wherever they are.
vs
SeismicThe AI platform for revenue execution
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Loom vs Seismic
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Seismic is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 55.2 versus 1.1 for Loom, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Loom if…
- You need GDPR or CCPA or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Async video for sharing updates and feedback
Choose Seismic if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.2 vs 1.1)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
- Enterprise content management and document governance at scale
- Deep analytics and AI-powered revenue execution
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Loom | Seismic |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.1% | 55.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #32 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 9.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 55 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loom 0pp · Seismic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Seismic leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoomSeismic
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Loom ranked higher
1Seismic ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Loom | Seismic |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do companies give reps content and coaching without a dedicated tool? | AI Mode | #5 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loom | Seismic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, built on AWS infrastructure | — |
| Integrations | — | 150+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework |
| Support | Priority support on Business and Business + AI plans, Dedicated support and a dedicated account manager on Enterprise | — |
| Founded | 2016 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $204M raised | Series E, led by Lightspeed Venture Partners · $440M raised |
| Best for | Sales, engineering, customer support and design teams that want to share context by video message instead of meetings or long emails. | Global enterprise sales, marketing and customer-facing teams in financial services, manufacturing, technology and life sciences |
Plans side by side
Loom
Starter$0
Business$18per user / month
Business + AI$24per user / month
EnterpriseCustom
Seismic
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loom
- Async video for sharing updates and feedback
Seismic
- Enterprise content management and document governance at scale
- Deep analytics and AI-powered revenue execution
- Strong for large enterprises needing content personalization and automation
- Highly rated on G2 and Gartner review data
- Broad enablement platform combining content, training, coaching, and buyer engagement
- Expensive, custom pricing with no transparent or free option
- Heavy and overkill for smaller or early-stage teams
- Long deployment timelines of three to six months
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loom vs Seismic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loom-vs-seismic, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.