MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Make vs Wrike
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 7.2 for Make, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Make if…
- You need more native integrations (3500+ vs 400+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 39% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
Choose Wrike if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 7.2)
- You need ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Make | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.2% | 13.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #13 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 1.8% | 4.4% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 26 |
| Positive in AI answers | 41% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Make 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Wrike leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MakeWrike
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Make ranked higher
1Wrike ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Make | Wrike |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a project management tool for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #7 | #5 |
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #6 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Make | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS | Cloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts |
| Integrations | 3500+ | 400+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant |
| Support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans | Professional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support |
| Founded | 2012 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Series B |
| Best for | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
Wrike
Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Wrike
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
- Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
- Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
- Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
- Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.