MastraTypeScript AI Framework for Agents and Apps
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Mastra vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 1.2 for Mastra, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Mastra if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 38% positive)
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 1.2)
- You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $250)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Mastra | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #56 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Mastra 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MastraUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Mastra ranked higher
1UiPath ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Mastra | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | Perplexity | #22 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Mastra | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $250 / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted on any Node.js-compatible environment, or hosted on Mastra Cloud and Mastra Platform. | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Shared Slack support channel (Enterprise), Dedicated support engineer (Enterprise), SLA support 8-5 Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm PST | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2024 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series A · $35M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams building AI agents in TypeScript and JavaScript | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Mastra
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mastra vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mastra-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.