Quickbase vs Zoho
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Zoho is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Choose Zoho if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 13% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Quickbase | Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 15.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.4% | up+1.7% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #25 | #9 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 3.9% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 24 |
| Positive in AI answers | 13% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp · Zoho +1.6999999999999993pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Zoho leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Quickbase | Zoho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #9 | #10 |
| How much does a low-code platform cost per month? | ChatGPT | #5 | #1 |
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #2 | #3 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #12 | #10 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | AI Mode | #7 | #6 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #13 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Quickbase | Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | 40+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence | — |
| Founded | 1999 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts | Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Funding round | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. | Businesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Zoho
- Strong value for money and low cost
- Free tier for small teams
- Broad functionality and integrated app ecosystem
- Good customization options
- Scales well as businesses grow
- Less premium user experience
- Pricing varies dramatically across products
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Quickbase vs Zoho”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/quickbase-vs-zoho, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.